Friday, January 24, 2020
AIDs :: Free AIDS Essays
                    A.I.D.S      Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome      A.I.D.S., also known as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, is a disorder of the body’s immune system. In A.I.D.S. the body stops producing some of its important natural defenses against disease. Victims often die from disease of infections they cannot fight. A.I.D.S is the result of an infection known as HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. A person with HIV gradually loses function of their immune system, becoming less able to fight off common colds and virus, thus eventually leading to death.      HIV was first revealed in the early 80’s in homosexual men. Infection with HIV does not necessarily mean that a person does have A.I.D.S. A person can be HIV positive for years without developing illnesses that are associated with the A.I.D.S. disease. HIV is characterized by a gradual deterioration of the immune system. Cells known as T-Helper cells are disabled and killed during the course of the infection. These cells play an important part in the human body because they signal other cells to perform their special functions.      The AIDS epidemic is growing very rapidly among minority populations and is a leading killer of African American males.      HIV can be transmitted by contact with infected blood, most often by the sharing of drug needles or syringes contaminated with blood containing the virus. The risk of contacting the HIV virus from blood transfusions has decreased since earlier years. Now all donated blood is screened for any signs of the HIV virus. HIV is spread most commonly by having sex with someone who already has the virus. The virus can enter the human body through the lining of the vagina, vulva, penis, rectum, or mouth during sex.      Almost all HIV infected children get the HIV virus from their mothers before or during birth. A drug known as AZT can reduce risk of transmission of the virus from mother to child. The virus can also be transmitted when an HIV infected mother nurses her child with infected milk.      Once HIV enters the body it infects many cell and replicates itself rapidly. Two to four weeks after the person is infected with the virus, they begin to suffer flu-like symptoms. HIV also is spread through contact with infected blood. Before blood was screened for evidence of HIV infection and before heat-treating techniques to destroy HIV in blood products were introduced, HIV was transmitted through transfusions of contaminated blood.          Laboratory studies reveal that saliva has natural properties that limit the power of HIV to infect. Research studies of people infected with HIV have found no evidence that the virus is spread to others through saliva such as by kissing.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Conflict and Communication Styles Within Families
Conflict and Communication Styles Within Families There are many areas to be explored underneath the Communications Studies umbrella making it quite difficult to narrow down a specific subject to write about. After performing some research I chose to discuss conflict and communication styles within families. Conflict seems to be an inevitable event in all-interpersonal relationships and the way one manages such conflict can determine how the rest of the relationship may be influenced. According to Wilmot and Hocker (2005). Conflict is usually a struggle between at least two parties who have indifferences in goals.Families tend to deal with this issue differently based upon communication patterns, perceptions and environment. As aforementioned the way conflict and communication is dealt with can differ within families based upon their communication styles or patterns. I thought it would be interesting to further study why this happens. Many families face difficult struggles, which can often be quite volatile and troubling. How family members deal with these struggles not only affects personal development but it can also affect younger children, what they learn from family conflict and how they can be impacted by exposure to such conflict.The first article I chose is Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Styles in Chinese Parent-Child Relationships written by Qin Zhang. The purpose of the study that was conducted was to investigate Chinese family communication patterns and the effects on children’s conflict styles and perceptions of parent-child relationships satisfaction (Zhang, 2007). The study found that Chinese family communication patterns are more conversation-oriented than conformity-oriented, and the collaborating and accommodating styles are the children's most preferred and the competing style the least preferred.A conformity-oriented family values the harmony and interdependence of family members, conflict avoidance and children’s ob edience to parents (Fitzpatrick, 2004; Koerner & Cvancara, 2002; Ritchie 1991). A conversation-oriented family values the individuality and independence of family members and spontaneous and unconstrained interactions (Koerner & Cvancara, 2002; Koerner & Fitzpatrick, 1997; Ritchie, 1991). The second article I chose was Family Communication Patterns and the Conflict styles Young Adults Use with Their Fathers by Rebecca Dumlao and Renee A.Botta. This study examines the link between family communication patterns between fathers and young adults to conflict styles and management. The levels of conformity and conversation encouraged by the young adults’ fathers also encouraged styles of managing conflict (Dumlao & Botta, 2000). Collaborating and accommodating were found to be the most consistent styles of conflict predicted by father type. Collaborating requires significant commitments of time and communicative effort to find a solution that mutually beneficial.A father who promot es substantial communication is more likely to raise children who us this skilled style (Dumlao & Botta, 2000). Accommodating is when on person gives in to another’s wants which often correlates with a family that encourages conformity. Young adults with fathers who encouraged conformity were often more accommodating during conflict. Comparison and Criticism: Both articles vary drastically but still offer good insight in regards to families and how factors such as cultural background or parent-child relationships can have a great effect on how conflict is resolved.In the first article, I found it interesting how culture can be a major influence on how conflict is handled and perceived. According to Hall (1976) â€Å"Chinese culture is high context, collectivistic and has large power distance†. Before reading the article I assumed, since the Chinese tend to be a more reserved and high context people that they would be more likely to avoid conflict. Traditional Chinese c ulture places great emphasis on harmony, face, relationship, and filial piety, which gives rise to the preference of conformity orientation (Ho, 1986; Hsu, 2002; Wu, 1996).That being said, it was very interesting to see that my assumptions were wrong. I was somewhat surprised to see that study findings show how Chinese parents have moved from conformity orientation to conversation orientation. Zhang (2007) states â€Å"The shift of family communication patterns might actually reflect the gradual transformation of Chinese culture from a highly hierarchical society to one that endorses equality and freedom†. Although the second article does not have to do with cultures it still touches on families and the way conflict is handled and resolved.What intrigued me about this article is that it takes about conflict with young adults and specifically their fathers. I’ve always been close with my father so I was interested to find out how different parenting skills can affect yo ung adults in how they deal with conflict now and in the future. There were various hypotheses during this study but one that stood out to me was that â€Å"young adults with protective fathers will use higher levels of both accommodating and avoiding styles with their fathers than those whose fathers are not protective†(Dumlao and Butta, 2000).I found this interesting mainly because I felt like I could relate to that assumption and it was fascinating to see the hypothesis to be proven true. In the findings it states that there are limited options for an individual who may come from this type of family those being to give in or don’t get involved at all. This spoke volumes to me because this is how tended to act/react in my relationship with my father, who was in fact, very protective. Once again, the articles are different but at the same time very similar. Both deal with conflict, families, and relationships between a parent and child.I don’t think us, as a s ociety, realize how cultural backgrounds, parent-child relationships, and environment can affect us at such an early age in how we deal with and resolve conflict with one another. I’m not too sure how I could apply this to my daily life or future endeavors since my conflict style has slowly been embedded in me since I was a child. I have taken the time to analyze myself though and reflect on how my culture and upbringing have effected the decisions I make and reactions towards conflict. Recently, in another class
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Analysis Of Irigaray In The Allegory Of The Cave - 756 Words
Irigaray 2: Explain Irigaray’s role as a reader of Plato. What does she hope to do? In interpreting Plato’s â€Å"The Allegory of the Cave,†Luce Irigaray implements a feminist critique of his work; thus, exposing its aid in the patriarchy, while essentially providing a viable response to the male-oriented exclusion of women from advancing through philosophical thought. Throughout her analysis of Plato, Irigaray is wary of the assumptions plagued when reading Plato and gives further reason for pause and patience in regard to this blatant acceptance of Plato’s system of ideas (Bova, 14 October 2017). Her initial objective is to shed light on his male-oriented concept of society; additionally, dissecting his ideas and reinstating them in order†¦show more content†¦In no position to turn their heads, or anything else.†(245). Once again, she is calling attention to this feminine approach by using the word â€Å"hystera,†which means â€Å"Uterus,†in which she finds a metaphor within Plato’s allegory that denounc es the hostility men hold in experiencing the womb, rather than running away from it. It was next her goal of creating a new context for the already male-dominated terminology used in Plato’s immediate work. She does this with the mere intention of establishing her critique and creating cause for a potential resolution in order to â€Å"hold our for another possibility of reason†(Bova, 14 October 2017), one that included women. Irigaray is using such a language that it is almost written as a poem. It is light, soft, and ultimately beautiful. It is fluid, in the sense that she is almost liquefying the text to go against this rigid and intensely logical form, Plato, as well as a majority of male philosophers, tend to use. She is now seeking some sort of a resolution to advance onto a notion that enables women to join a discourse that they did not have access to prior. Her melodious language, which is evident with throughout the entire text, deconstructs the very thing t hat she is critiquing, meaning she does not write in the same manner in which Plato writes in to defend her argumentation, but rather uses a different approach which states her goals through this powerfulShow MoreRelatedSocrates Downfall Of Socrates2066 Words  | 9 Pageshas no concealed purposes because he is very verbose. 2) Why is Irigaray a modern feminist? In Plato’s hysteria, it seems like Irigaray is using an allegory to acknowledge that there is an omission of feminism and the idea that why the non-appearance of women has not been examined. It may be unintentional, but it is a repetitive pattern in Philosophical works or works in general, which makes Irigaray a modern feminist. Irigaray mentions in the beginning: â€Å"Certain men, then – sex undeterminedâ€â€are
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)