Analysis Of Irigaray In The Allegory Of The Cave - 756 Words

Irigaray 2: Explain Irigaray’s role as a reader of Plato. What does she hope to do? In interpreting Plato’s â€Å"The Allegory of the Cave,† Luce Irigaray implements a feminist critique of his work; thus, exposing its aid in the patriarchy, while essentially providing a viable response to the male-oriented exclusion of women from advancing through philosophical thought. Throughout her analysis of Plato, Irigaray is wary of the assumptions plagued when reading Plato and gives further reason for pause and patience in regard to this blatant acceptance of Plato’s system of ideas (Bova, 14 October 2017). Her initial objective is to shed light on his male-oriented concept of society; additionally, dissecting his ideas and reinstating them in order†¦show more content†¦In no position to turn their heads, or anything else.† (245). Once again, she is calling attention to this feminine approach by using the word â€Å"hystera,† which means â€Å"Uterus,† in which she finds a metaphor within Plato’s allegory that denounc es the hostility men hold in experiencing the womb, rather than running away from it. It was next her goal of creating a new context for the already male-dominated terminology used in Plato’s immediate work. She does this with the mere intention of establishing her critique and creating cause for a potential resolution in order to â€Å"hold our for another possibility of reason† (Bova, 14 October 2017), one that included women. Irigaray is using such a language that it is almost written as a poem. It is light, soft, and ultimately beautiful. It is fluid, in the sense that she is almost liquefying the text to go against this rigid and intensely logical form, Plato, as well as a majority of male philosophers, tend to use. She is now seeking some sort of a resolution to advance onto a notion that enables women to join a discourse that they did not have access to prior. Her melodious language, which is evident with throughout the entire text, deconstructs the very thing t hat she is critiquing, meaning she does not write in the same manner in which Plato writes in to defend her argumentation, but rather uses a different approach which states her goals through this powerfulShow MoreRelatedSocrates Downfall Of Socrates2066 Words   |  9 Pageshas no concealed purposes because he is very verbose. 2) Why is Irigaray a modern feminist? In Plato’s hysteria, it seems like Irigaray is using an allegory to acknowledge that there is an omission of feminism and the idea that why the non-appearance of women has not been examined. It may be unintentional, but it is a repetitive pattern in Philosophical works or works in general, which makes Irigaray a modern feminist. Irigaray mentions in the beginning: â€Å"Certain men, then – sex undetermined—are